The Independent Ear

Engaging Your Audience

 

Far too many artists choose to pretty much ignore or even disdain their audience.  They do so at their own peril.  While not every artist is Cannonball Adderley, who was always something of a stand-up comic with his between tunes patter, it is entirely necessary for artists to engage their audience.  You’d be surprised how deeply your audience will be impressed by a few simple words of introduction of what you’re about to play or outro of what you just concluded.  I’m almost certain you don’t compose in a vacuum – you must have some specific theme or intent in mind when you write your music; after all, every tune has a story.  Your audience will have a richer experience with your music – and demand return engagements – if you will simply let them in on the mystery.  Let the audience know why you’ve chosen to play a particular tune, and inform them who will be featured or who will be soloing on a given tune.

 

 

Stage craft is a very important and largely overlooked element from jazz education programs so many of today’s jazz musicians emanate from.  Besides letting your audience in on the mystery by introducing your selections and offering informative asides on your intent and on the musicians who are working with you, it is wise to be very vigilant on the content of each set.  Proper programming and pacing of a set is of great importance in enhancing your audience’s experience… and desire to hear you again.  For example, nothing is more boring than a set filled with selections during which every member of the band solos… and even more boring when the solos are in the same order every tune. 

 

 

Giving your audience the impression you’re on autopilot is not the way to develop a following.  Every member of the band need not solo every tune.  And be real mindful of how many choruses you’re playing each solo.  Strings of lengthy solos can easily cause an audience to zone out, minds wandering towards what they’re going to do if this set would ever end, rather than enjoying what you’re playing.  And try accompanying the drum and bass solos sometimes!  It’s always been a curious custom that the rhythm section accompanies the other soloists, but when their turn comes the rest of the band drops out or leaves the stage entirely.  There are bound to be a few diehards or hard cores in the audience, but when striving to build your fan base they’re not the ones you need to rope in, you’ve already got them.

 

 

In the case of stage manner, I’m afraid Miles Davis ruined more than a few musicians who thought they too could get away with not communicating with their audience, not introducing tunes, failure to introduce the musicians, and being largely disdainful of the audience.  But don’t forget, Miles had a speech impediment and could barely emote above a whisper.  And besides that how many of you remember late period Miles when he would at least hold up signs identifying his musicians?

 

 

As regards length of solos, I’m afraid John Coltrane may have ruined more than a few musicians.  Don’t forget, there was only one John Coltrane and there will never be another!  Also don’t forget those 3-minute classics Charlie Parker regularly spun out.  He was once quoted to the effect that when soloing, after 3-4 choruses you’re just practicing.  Just because you know your way around your instrument a bit doesn’t mean you have such a wealth of ideas or are capable of sustaining audience interest over 20 or 30 choruses.  John Coltrane had something to say for 20 minutes, you may not.  Proper solo editing is a skill all musicians need to nurture and observe, lest we fail to do our collective jobs at developing and broadening the audience for this wonderful music.

 

 

Posted in The Tip | 2 Comments

Record Reviews – 8/1/07

Here we provide capsule viewpoints on independent jazz recordings.  These are not “reviews” per se, in the traditional sense of music magazine recordings’ reviews.  The mere fact that these recordings appear here mean they are in some way meritorious in terms of their music (why waste space with negativity). 

 

As opposed to standard music magazine record reviews, we’re concerned here also with rating how they stack up in terms of such marketplace essentials as consumer accessibility – i.e. whether proper contact information is provided – packaging considerations and such important and often overlooked aspects as whether the packaging provides adequate information about the given recording and the artists to meet the needs of consumers, writers, and radio.  Consider this section part of our ongoing technical assistance efforts for artists.    

 

This review section focuses on recommended-to-highly recommended recordings from the vast universe of independent jazz and related recordings, including CDs and DVDs.  T he so-called “majors” have almost completely abdicated their responsibility to release new jazz recordings. Digital technology enables and even encourages myriad small boutique labels and do-it-yourself (DIY) artists to take up the slack.  And with the retail record marketplace undergoing vast changes in response to new technology, DIY artists are discovering their best, most direct sales are on the gig.  Eager fans queuing up post-performance — cash at the ready — anxious to take home that evening’s featured artist’s latest release, is a common sight nowadays, and one that is increasingly lucrative for the recording artist.

 

Regarding these technical assistance matters, consider this frequent conundrum: As often happens at WPW (89.3 FM Washington, DC; www.wpfw.org) when our listeners want information on what they just heard (usually of the “what’s that, and where can I get it?” variety) they simply call the studio line.  All too often, after searching and searching the disk and the CD booklet programmers are flummoxed – no phone number, address, web site, email address, not even a suitable label name that one could investigate on the web are readily discernible.  And given the nature of jazz radio these days, a significant number of programmers spin their own libraries on air.  Some – yours truly included – choose not to tote around loads of plastic jewel cases and instead use those convenient CD booklet holders, carrying only the disk and booklet to the studio. 

 

It is now essential that all pertinent CD information be listed not only on the back panel of the jewel case but either within the CD booklet or imprinted on the disk itself.  Why are so many artists failing to list a simple label name for their independent, self-produced recordings?  Part of the idea here folks is building your catalogue.  Anyone in the record business will tell you that catalogue development is the key to building a label, even if it’s just for your own recordings.  If you don’t go under a record company name – even if it’s simply your given name – how are you going to build a catalogue?  T hese and other vital elements will be graded as part of our review criteria, under the heading Info factor.  Sometimes the info – or lack thereof – may be a drawback, but we don’t waste time here with jive records in terms of musical quality.  Just so you know, these disks all have certain musical charms.

 

June April 

What Am I? 

Highlife Music

 This an interesting title for a young woman who has a clear sense of herself.  June April has a voice that’s more than a little in tune with the Creator, as well as hip hop accents and beats, neo-soul sensibilities, all informed by jazz.  Ms. April endows her controlled enthusiasms with a clear, sure voice and engages very complimentary backing musicians.  She’s comfortable scatting but not over-wrought with it.  She knows the spirituals, as is clearly displayed by an all-too-brief “Somebody’s Knockin’ at Your Door,” and she delivers a tender “Come Sunday” with stripped-down acoustic guitar accompaniment.  Above all there’s a palpable sincerity in her artistry.

 

Info factor: The CD booklet contains copious acknowledgements (June is one grateful woman!); lacks track listings (back jewel case only) but does contain some of her lyrics; does list personnel & songwriting credits.  Web, email and (free) download contacts are listed: www.juneapril.cominfo@juneapril.com

Info Grade: B

 

Continue reading

Posted in Records | 3 Comments

ABOUT TETRA SPEAKERS: I do a great deal of my listening in my office.  That’s largely where I preview new recordings for potential spins on my radio program (Friday Drivetime Jazz, 4-6:00 p.m. on WPFW 89.3 FM, Pacifica Radio in Washington, DC; listen live at www.wpfw.org), for my artistic direction work (see elsewhere on this site), and for writing & reviewing purposes; along with the trusty iPod for portable listening.  My aged NAD receiver had been faltering for the last few months and replacement time was near.  Yes, I know the audiophile’s biblical drill: separates are best for top-shelf sound.  But let’s face it, the average office is a limited space and the thought of cramming separate amplifier, tuner, pre-amp, etc., etc. wasn’t real practical.

 

 

Being more than satisfied with my two previous NAD receivers – from both performance and budget standpoints – I resolved to purchase their latest model, the C720BEE to go along with a CD burner I was well-satisfied with.  For these ears the speaker system is the key to good sound.  In this case I cast aside budget considerations and determined to go beyond the Circuit City/Best Buy-level speakers and seek something more in the audiophile atmosphere.

 

 

Ordinarily JazzTimes’ monthly Sound Advice column is a bit windy for me; and I suspect the same holds true for all but the audiophile amongst us.  But the November ’06 issue column, titled “The Making of a Jazz Audiophile”, caught my attention primarily because it detailed the listening habits of several jazz artists, including NEA Jazz Master bassist Ron Carter.  As the column recounted, Carter “describe[ed] how the Tetra 606 speakers he purchased last year have finally made him a believer in the legitimacy of so-called high-end audio…”  On the next two pages were photos of these rather advanced looking speaker systems. 

 

 

Curiosity properly piqued I visited the Tetra web site (www.tetraspeakers.com) and was further intrigued by the speaker’s glowing endorsements from such learned ears as NEA Jazz Masters Benny Golson and Herbie Hancock.  So via the listed email contact I inquired about the location of the nearest local Tetra dealer.  Wonder of wonders Adrian Butts, the company president himself, responded almost immediately.  One thing led to another and I ordered their office system-friendly bookshelf model Tetra 120u speakers.

 

 

A few days later when they arrived and I eagerly hooked them up to my new NAD, I was amazed at the clarity of these speakers; the absence of artificial bass and treble boost (no, you’ll read no audiophile hoo-haw about sonic hieroglyphics here), and the fact that what I now heard from the CDs spinning in the office was a sound atmosphere truer to the optimum live performance experience than any comparable bookshelf speakers in my experience.  So if you visit the Tetra site (www.tetraspeakers.com) you’ll find this writer among the happy endorsers of this great product.

 

 

Tetra is a Canada-based company whose speakers – ranging from my bookshelf 120us to Ron Carter’s monster 606 models – are nothing short of extraordinary for home jazz recording reproduction, and any other music I’ve spun through them — including blues, R&B, African and hip hop flavors.  To learn more visit www.tetraspeakers.com or call them toll free at 866/626-0030 and be sure to let Tetra know that Open Sky sent you!

 

 

Posted in Tech Side | 1 Comment

Billy Taylor

 

Billy Taylor was in DC as part of his ongoing curatorial efforts and guidance in all things jazz at the Kennedy Center .  Thanks to Dr. Taylor’s leadership and ideas the Kennedy Center now boasts a jazz program second to none on the performing arts palace scene.  In addition to regular series of concert performances at the 500+ seat penthouse Terrace Theatre, the KC hosts one of Dr. Taylor’s great passions the annual Mary Lou Williams Women in Jazz Festival.  And as a means of providing a performance podium for younger artists and those whose audience is more comfortably accommodated by a club setting, the Kennedy Center accomplished the neat trick of transforming a former multi-purpose room on its upper level catty-corner from the Terrace into the quite-comfortable KC Jazz Club.  Our conversation with Dr. Taylor came as the KC commenced their one-time-only Jazz in Our Time program, which honored 3 dozen jazz legends on a gala concert evening, with satellite programming focusing on several of the masters on succeeding evenings.

 

Willard Jenkins: What was the genesis of the Jazz In Our Time program?

 

 

Billy Taylor: It started some time ago.  I was asked to do a jazz timeline for educational purposes.  I had done something like this for a book I wrote and they said it would be very helpful in working with kids to just put it down.  Music changed when we got certain kinds of communications; then it changed again when we got the telephone and television and things like that came into being, and it just changed the way the music was presented and the way it was perceived.

 

 

I took that idea and we’ve been using it for quite awhile now.  We got to talking about what we’re going to do this year in terms of something special with jazz and they got the idea – as a matter of fact the [ Kennedy Center ] president got the idea, based on the timeline that I had done – to do something special with jazz and celebrate the whole thing with the jazz masters.

 

 

What we’re trying to do as a whole with the Kennedy Center jazz program is to fight the idea that jazz is dead.  People keep coming up with that, saying ‘man we’ve got all these old guys playing jazz and jazz is dead, everybody that’s playing jazz is either dead or dying…’  Last night I played at Julliard and they gave an award to several of the masters.  Here we are, all of us on the stage were over 80 years old and everybody who was playing was like a teenager or in their 20s.  What these kids are playing now, and the kind of camaraderie we have… it’s very exciting.

 

 

What we’re trying to do with these programs is to say ‘listen to these kids, don’t be listening to them because they are kids, listen to them because they’ve got something to say.’  We’re trying to present them, but we’re also trying to present them within the context of what we’re doing; it has nothing to do with age, it just has to do with passing it on.  I’d like to see this being done at more schools.

 

 

WJ: The whole idea of Masters interacting with students?

 

 

BT: Yeah right.  Just the fact that we co-exist (masters and students).

 

 

WJ: Do you find these opportunities lacking today – opportunities for masters and students to interact?

 

 

BT: Yeah, most people don’t do that; they present me and the only chance for the kids to talk is if I give a lecture demonstration or something like that in the classroom.

Continue reading

Posted in Artist's P.O.V. | 1 Comment

Sibongile Khumalo

 

 

 

One of the pleasures of the 2007 Cape Town International Jazz Festival (read a review elsewhere on www.openskyjazz.com) was the special band drummer-composer-conceptualist Jack DeJohnette dubbed Intercontinental.  This latest in DeJohnette’s seemingly endless well of special projects brought together musicians from four different continents: Jack and bassist Jerome Harris (U.S.), pianist Danilo Perez (Panama), saxophonist Jason Yarde and trumpeter Byron Wallen (U.K.), and most auspiciously the thrilling multi-octave South African vocalist Sibongile Khumalo (pron. See-Bon-Geelay Koo-mah-lo).

 

One of the more useful aspects of overseas jazz festivals is the daily artist press conferences which are all too rare at stateside festivals.  The Intercontinental band’s press conference afforded Suzan Jenkins and me an opportunity to sit down with Ms. Khumalo for a conversation.  Jazz in particular, and music in general in South Africa is as broad and rich as anyplace on the African continent.

 

Sibongile Khumalo is an extraordinarily versatile singer, as comfortable with Jack DeJohnette as she is in the role of Bizet’s Carmen or singing Brahms Alto Rhapsody.  Her discography leaps comfortably between the supposed stylistic chasms that separate jazz and European classical music, and her artistry is deeply bred in the vocal and language folkloric traditions of South Africa .  Its time the world woke up to the vocal force of nature known as Sibongile Khumalo.  Among other things she shared some fascinating insights into the unique challenges South African artists face in making their work post-apartheid.

 

Willard Jenkins: The first time we came to Cape Town for the festival, in 2005, we heard a lot of exceptional South African instrumentalists, but I was curious about the vocal side.  It was recommended that I had to get some of your recordings.  At the CD Warehouse (now known as Musica) store on the Cape Town waterfront I found the jazz record you made at the Market Theatre, then subsequently I ordered one of your classical discs from Sterns music.  Duke Ellington described Ella Fitzgerald as being “beyond category.”  It’s obvious that you’re beyond category as well.  Talk about the broadness of your approach to music.

 

Sibongile Khumalo: In 1991 I’d been doing concerts with a symphony orchestra, doing oratorios, doing recitals, but also working with a brilliant jazz guitarist who passed away a couple of years ago named Allen Kwela.  Between Allen and another jazz vocalist who also passed away a year ago, I was exposed to jazz as a genre, as a potential for expression.

 

At some point people say ‘…and you have such a wonderful voice, whey don’t you record something…?’  I’d be like ‘what am I going to record; I just sing what I sing…’  At that stage, early in my career, I didn’t feel like I was singing anything that I felt was important simply because – maybe that’s not the right word – I wasn’t singing things that I had been taught to sing.  I was singing “Messiah,” I was singing “Elijah,” some arias from operas here and there…  But it was not something that I thought I could put down in a recording for posterity.  I felt I needed to have a voice, some kind of language of my own, but I didn’t know what that was.

 

Pop music, South African pop music – the way that Yvonne Chaka Chaka, Brenda Fassi, Sipho Mabuse, and all those groups, was big as well; there was a whole circuit of festivals the same as you have jazz festivals at the moment.  That also was not something that I felt I could quite speak to.  So [her evolution towards jazz] kinda happened organically.  I started drawing from those kinds of elements that I’d grown up with: choral music, some of the classical stuff, and I put together a show called “The 3 Faces of Sibongile Khumalo” in ’92.  In that program there were elements of the classical world that I’d come from, elements of the jazz that Alan and Sophie Mqina had exposed me to, and some of the traditional stuff that I grew up with in the township [Soweto]. 

 

I did bits and pieces of all of that, just doing some Bach, some of the choral work, some scat, incorporating some of the stuff from the operas on top of the improvisations that the guys were doing.  It was kind of happening like that.  Over the years that has kind of evolved and developed slowly, gradually.  Then I sort of fell back to my comfort zone again and I started doing some of the more sort of easy on the ears sort of things with the album before the classical one, called Quest, which was drawing on some of the old South African jazz standards without going into the whole sort of stretching out – just singing the music and having a good time with it.

 

That was until two years ago when I was challenged in a sense.  Jack [DeJohnette] said ‘I’d like to work with her…’  I said ‘OK, Jack DeJohnette wants to work with me… OK, we’ll see about that.’  That was my attitude initially.  A year ago I got this call ‘we’ve found an opportunity to get this thing going for you and Jack in March 2007 [Cape Town International Jazz Festival].  I said ‘March is fine, its cool, its OK…’  Three months ago I get this call from Jack DeJohnette and I said ‘alright, this is happening…’  I had to start thinking about this; the conversations happened and we shared the music, sending each other discs and songs.  I started listening and I was thinking to myself, ‘I knew Jack DeJohnette was deep, but this is DEEP.  How am I going to deal with this stuff?’

 

I’m told about Danilo Perez , I’m told about Jerome Harris… Jason [Yarde] I’d met and worked with in the U.K. a few times, Byron [Wallen] I was aware of but not too closely.  So I’m thinking ‘OK…’  I talked to people here and told them Jack DeJohnette… this is really happening!  So I was asked the question ‘well, who’s in the band?’  I said “the pianist is a guy called Danilo Perez , and Jerome Harris…”  They said ‘who…?’  I said ‘ Danilo Perez …’  My son in particular… I told him I’d listened to [Danilo]’s music, he’s such a beautiful player…’  My son said ‘he’s a what…?  Ma, do you hear yourself?’  I said Danilo sounds good, he’s very nice actually…’  My son said ‘Ma, he’s awesome… he’s an awesome musician… are you listening?  I said ‘yeah, OK, he’s great, sure…’

 

So that’s how this journey has been to this point.  My approach, coming back to that long-winded answer to your question, my approach is informed really by where I come from.  It was all of that…  What’s happening though with [Intercontinental] is that all of these things sometimes happen in a song.  Before it was the classical element, it’s the choral, it’s the jazz bit, and it’s traditional… sometimes in the same song everything kind of comes together.

 

WJ: That kind of sums up Jack’s Intercontinental Project approach. 

Continue reading

Posted in Artist's P.O.V. | Leave a comment