The Independent Ear

Moody’s From Heaven


Anyone who has experienced the joy of hearing the great NEA Jazz Master James Moody’s hilarious turnaround on the old Tin Pan Alley tune “Pennie’s From Heaven,” which he re-cast as “Bennie’s From Heaven” can appreciate that this fabulous man has ascended on a one-way ticket to heaven. While it is with great sorrow that we contemplate a world without James Moody, we can certainly re-live the joy he gave so many of us during his all-too-short 85 years on this planet and turn sorrow to joy. James Moody was without question one of a kind — superb saxophonist, exquisite flutist, one of the funniest vocalists you’ve ever heard, and a man who spread joy with such abundance he always made you feel good when you encountered him. And if you were fortunate enough to have spent any time with him away from the bandstand you were deeply rewarded by the experience.

I recall the first time I interviewed Moody. It was back in the early 80s and I was working for Arts Midwest in Minneapolis. Moody came north to perform at a local club for the weekend so I set up an interview with him for the City Pages alternative weekly. Moody didn’t hesitate to invite me to his modest hotel room for our chat. When he opened the door, with that infectious smile planted on his jolly mug, the first thing I noticed was an incredible array of seemingly every imaginable vitamin supplement spread across his dresser. Then and there I knew this was a man who took care of himself, and indeed he did live a long and rich life, finally succumbing to the demon cancer last week at the ripe young age of 85. Despite those 85 years, Moody seemed forever ageless; maybe it was that perpetually sunny disposition and the fact that I never heard him utter a discouraging word — though if a musician didn’t come correct in the jazz tradition Moody respected, he was quick to call it; but never in a mean-spirited or egotistical way.

A warm encounter with James Moody always yielded a big hug; thereafter anyone who knew the deal knew you’d been in Moody’s company and been enveloped by one of his warm bearhugs. You see Moody was forever bathed in what we used to call in high school “smell good.” Moody had his own formulaic cologne which he had made specifically for himself, and he luxuriated in that wonderful oil. I used to tease him about giving up the formula whenever I encountered he and his sweet & lovely bride Linda. Until lo and behold one afternoon I went to the mailbox, opened a padded envelope from James & Linda (have you ever met two people who were such a true pair in every sense of the word?) and there was my very own vial of that inimitable oil. So now when I conjure up James Moody and seek some vicarious joy, I can pop on one of his fine recordings, re-hash our numerous encounters, and take an olfactory hit of that “smell good.” Yes indeed, Moody’s really from Heaven now! Rest easy my friend…

Posted in General Discussion | Leave a comment

From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta pt. 2

Guitarist-educator-author-jazz club impressario Pascal Bokar Thiam, who is of Senegalese descent, continues our conversation on the origins of blues & jazz and how that story has been distorted down through history.

What was your ultimate mission in writing the book “From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta”?

To share with the African American community that we are all Africans, that we have a history of our own, that we come from a great civilization; that we have settled this land here in the U.S. against all odds; that we have indeed high standards of aesthetics; that these standards of aesthetics gave America a unique sense of identity away from the civilizational canons of Europe; and that God put us on this Earth with a mission and that mission is to improve the daily lives of the whole of humanity. Africans began humanity. Africans started the concept of civilization. All races emanate from the African source and as such we have always had a positive destiny. We have had great challenges and great victories as a people but the struggle against evil is fierce and it comes in all shapes and skin tones, and the most complex issue is to recognize who our allies are in this daily human struggle for a better world, and not to be blindsided by the narrow concepts of race. Race is a trick that God played on humans to see if they had developed the intelligence of the heart, because ultimately moral authority always comes from inclusion.

Writing this book obviously must have taken you on some rewarding travels; talk about some of the things you learned from writing this book.

I was fortunate to have grown up in Senegal and Mali and traveled throughout West Africa to Morocco, etc. But the reflection it took to write the book from my journey as a man of multi-cultural experiences is ultimately what crystallized my convictions. What I have learned is that we are one humanity, living on one planet capable of the greatest achievements and the greatest horrors and that only through education can we collectively make the right decisions so that our people, our nation, our children and the children of all races can reach for a better tomorrow; everyday is a path toward this attainment. Only education is the path to a more just and peaceful world.

The book helped me focus the real priorities of life as I pondered the economic realities and reasons behind the Atlantic slave trade, the deafening silence of the Christian Church, and the abuses of mankind perpetrated and generated by the induced educational silence of an academia enslaved by business interests onto the masses.

The book helped me understand and refocus the mechanisms of societies and the frictions that are inherently born out of greed. Greed and the notions of business led to the Atlantic slave trade. Greed led to the abuses of human beings in the plantations of the South.

Once your book is out there, how do you foresee all of your pursuits intersecting and interacting — teaching, playing, operating a club, and your author responsibilities?

I’m going to need a lot of help and I can see the challenges. I have to learn to pace myself, which I am not very good at, so this will be a learning process. Learning takes time and there is no substitute for time, but it’s ultimately an awful price to pay for learning because time is the only thing that we are all short of.

I am a big fan of the poetic flow, which is why I am amazed daily at the true King of Rock n’ Roll Chuck Berry’s accomplishments. He owns a club. He has left us a legacy so wide and deep that we still cannot appreciate its magnitude. He drove the biggest imperialist nation in the world (i.e. England) to forget about its own music and embrace the Blues of the African American communities of the South (i.e. the Rolling Stones, Beatles, Clapton, the Who, Yardbirds, Led Zeppelin, etc.). And so when you talk about an achievement of monumental proportions, there you have it.

Pascal Bokar Thiam is President of Savanna Jazz in San Francisco, CA; he is on the Performing Arts Department faculty at the University of San Francisco, and the French American International School. And he is a working guitarist.

Posted in General Discussion | Leave a comment

Listening Party with Randy Weston & Willard Jenkins/African Rhythms & The Storyteller

As part of Ken Druker’s excellent series of interviews and conversations, Randy Weston and I participated in one of his Jazz at Lincoln Center Listening Parties before a very attentive audience on Tuesday, December 7 at JALC’s Ertegun Jazz Hall of Fame space. We talked African Rhythms and Randy’s brand new disc The Storyteller (Motema). Here’s the full story…

Posted in General Discussion | 2 Comments

From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta (Pt. 1)

Guitarist-educator, and now author, Pascal (Bokar) Thiam aims to broaden the historical timeline of blues and jazz well beyond the romantic notion of ‘up the Mississippi from New Orleans…’  Though I had the pleasure of spinning Pascal’s in-performance ’07 CD Savannah Jazz Club on radio, I didn’t have the opportunity to meet him until about two months ago at the first in a series of book signing & reading events for African Rhythms: the autobiography of Randy Weston (Composed by Randy Weston, Arranged by Willard Jenkins; Duke University Press) at Eso Won Books in L.A.  It was then that the very modest, scholarly Mr. Thiam laid a copy of his book From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta (pub: Cognella) on me.  Right from the jump the book is impressive if only for its richly illustrated design.  The book’s premise and subsequent text are even more impressive.


Pascal (Bokar) Thiam was born in Paris and raised in Segou, Mali and later Dakar, Senegal.  His parents immersed him in the music of such favorites of theirs as the MJQ, Nat Cole, and Sonny Rollins from an early age.  He initially took up the piano at age 8, switching forevermore to the guitar at 12.  While at a military school he became indelibly drawn to a career in music, eventually performing in France and Senegal extensively with the Afro fusion band Akwaaba.

In ’80, on a floating jazz festival at sea he met a number of jazz greats and became further immersed in the music, which eventually led him to study at Berklee in ’83, where he earned honors and rubbed shoulders with classmates who comprise a healthy slice of the 21st century jazz vanguard, including Branford Marsalis, Cyrus Chestnut, Greg Osby, Jeff “Tain” Watts, Antonio Hart, and Jacky Terrasson.

In ’99, following several very fruitful engagements, including his successful incorporation of a Senegalese Sabar rhythm section in his jazz pursuits and a relationship with Accurate Records, Pascal relocated to the San Francisco Bay Area.  He currently teaches jazz and world music at the University of San Francisco and operates his Savannah Jazz Club.

On the subject of his powerful and revealing new book From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta (Cognella), obviously some questions were in order.

Pascal (Bokar) Thiam’s illuminating book From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta

How and when did jazz and blues become such passions for a Senegalese man?

Pascal (Bokar) Thiam: I have two explanations.  Let me start by saying that this music some call Jazz is a passion for all West Africans because we can intuitively feel the extension of our standards of aesthetics across the Atlantic Ocean in the social and musical expressions of the journey of our African family through the Atlantic Slave Trade. This music of the Americas is part of the larger West African story.  It is a testimony to our resilience as a people, a testimony to our genius as a community, a testimony to our faith in God as a nation and belief that the ancestors will always show us the way… “through many dangers, toils and snares we shall overcome”; that is one of the very early gospel lyrics.

When you listen attentively to the Sabar drum of Senegal [editor’s note: check out the master of that drum, Dou Dou N’diaye Rose] and become familiar with the West African traditional music of the kora of the Soundiata Keita era and the improvisational systems of the balafon, the ngoni [ed. note: an African member of the lute family] and/or xaalam, it becomes apparent to you as a listener that the core of African American music as expressed through the rural Blues, through the Jazz improvisational conceptualization, its sense of swing and syncopation, its call and response mechanisms, its bent tonalities, its harmonic 7th and sharp nine sensibilities… all of which are present in the traditional music of West African Culture, there would be no Jazz.  It is as simple as that.  Listening to traditional West African music drives you naturally to appreciate the rural Blues which are born out of the social experiences of West Africans in the Mississippi Delta and the South, and the African American Baptist Church socio-cultural foundation for Jazz and its sensibilities.

I love the sound of the kora, and as you know, West Africa has a powerful culture of string instruments, and so around age 12 I started playing guitar.  Once you start listening to guitarists in the various musical idioms you can’t but be struck by the mastery of some artists regardless of where they live.  In West Africa they were Sekou Diabate, Kante and Manfila, Franco; in the U.S.A. Albert King, Robert Johnson, John Lee Hooker, B.B. King, Jimi Hendrix, Charlie Christian, Wes Montgomery, George Benson; in Classical styles Andres Segovia, Henry Dorigny, Alexandre Lagoya, Paco de Lucia, etc.  But the guitarists that came closest to my musical sensibilities were African and African American, and so I embarked upon the journey that led me to appreciate this idiom called Jazz.

It is clear and no one denies that Jazz as we understand it today, with the trap drumset, the upright bass, etc. developed in the United States and was created in the United States.  But what we as a nation in the U.S. fail to state clearly (mostly to appease European Americans who today desperately want to have played an important role in the making of the art form that defined the genius and the identity of our nation’s people and music, music which until the mid 40s they themselves called “Jungle Music”; the same European American intellectual and artistic community who denied Ellington the Pulitzer Prize) is that the standards of aesthetics and the culture that gave birth to these standards of aesthetics that govern the music of the Delta Blues, Soul, Jazz, etc. ’till this day are standards of aesthetics that emanated from the civilizational cultural paradigms of the 3 empires: Ghana, Mali, and Songhai, empires which ruled civilizations in West Africa and the world from the 5th century until the 18th, and centered in Timbuktu on the Niger River.  These populations from West Africa settled the New World.

The second reason is more a theory and I firmly believe it.  I was born in Paris at a time when my parents were hanging out in the Jazz clubs of Saint Germain.  My dad was one of the first generation of young Africans to obtain a scholarship to go to college in Paris, and this is an age when you usually meet your wife.  My dad loved Jazz.  He was at school during the day and in the Jazz clubs at night.  He met Dizzy, Miles, and Kenny Clarke in Paris in the late fifties and early sixties, along with Dexter Gordon, Buhaina and so many others.  My theory is that when I was in my mother’s womb and unable to escape I was listening to Jazz whether I liked it or not and the sound wave frequencies of the music, its swing and syncopation, harmonic and tonal colors stayed in the back of my cortex as I was developing.  So in many ways my direction was pre-ordained, so to speak.  Shortly after I was born we moved to the magical place of Segou, Mali where the spirits congregate and where I still have a significant amount of family.  I used to put my feet in the Niger River under the watchful eye of my parents when I was a walking baby.  It is a dangerous river with lots of crocodiles.

My passion for Jazz and Blues was born out of the fact that these art forms require a phenomenal balance of intellect, creativity, sensibility and soul and I embraced the challenge because I realized through Jazz, how high and complex the standards of aesthetics were in this process of spontaneous creativity from an African perspective of art.

Ultimately I came to realize that there is an intellectual content, and unity of soul and perspective in all African-derived art forms.  This is what Senghor referred to as the civilization of the Universal with Africa and African aesthetics at the center of that intuitive, creative, rhythmic flow-inferred universe.  Whether I play Senegalese music, or the Malian repertoire, country music or the music of Gillespie or Parker, the roots of expression and improvisational core systems are the same.  The accents on the rhythms in their relationship to the cosmic rhythmic flow of our humanity, whether tonal or syncopated in convergence with its rotating planets, are the same.

The soul principles of the African rhythmic balance of our lives as we improvise, regardless of the musical medium, is in the hermeneutic interplay of three against two as a referential starting point.  It’s all the same concepts of balance.  There is unity of principles in action, which is why America’s foremost composer, Edward Kennedy Ellington, stated for all of us something that we deeply feel in West Africa and that he translated in his famous title “It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that…”

How are you able to juggle your many pursuits, from playing the guitar to operating a club, to teaching, to writing your book?

I am doing very poorly at juggling, I need a lot of help, and I am very fortunate to have [wife] Vicki and partners, close friends and staff members who do a wonderful job a keeping the train on the tracks.  The book took longer that I wanted because I was looking for a collaboration but my other pals in academia were too busy with their own projects.  So I decided to write it myself because the ancestors probably decided that time was of the essence.

Talk about your club; how and when you developed it and what you hope to achieve with this venue.

As an African living in America, I opened the Club with Vicki and her sister (both of whom are teachers) because I realized that we as a community in the U.S. were losing the cultural war as we lost the Clubs through the so-called process of “integration.”  The music venues, which were so important in the African American community as civilizational and community unifying centers where art could flourish and standards of expression could live long enough to gain refinement, disappeared.  Africans have always had extremely high standards of aesthetics when it came to expression and refinement in every endeavor that we conduct.  You hear it in the music of the kofa and the balafon, in Charlie Parker playing “Laura”, in Miles playing “My Funny Valentine”, in the craftsmanship of our blacksmiths, in the designs of our sculptors; that’s what we do, that’s what we embrace as a collective when we can take the time to breathe, to gather our thoughts and ourselves.  But we are in the midst of a brutal economic, political and academic oppression and it is getting harder and harder for us to teach our young people the ways and the values of the ancestors.  That is why our young people don’t understand how far down as a community we fell in the assessment of our aesthetics under capitalism.

As an educator, I am sick to my stomach when I see how academia, show business, and simply business entities have in tandem stolen the music, the art forms, and distorted the contributions of people of African descent in this country.  Why do books continue to call Paul Whiteman the “King” of a music he barely understood when James Reese Europe, King Oliver, Buddy Bolden, Armstrong and Ellington had already codified its principles?

Why is academia continuing to print that Benny Goodman is the “King” of a music he himself never conceptualized?  It took John Hammond, a Vanderbilt, going up to Harlem to purchase the book of the Father of Big Band writing, Fletcher Henderson, for Goodman’s career to take off.  As for the other European American “King” of the music of Chuck Berry, that is another falsehood that academia in America continues to perpetrate and project into our young African and European American generations.  So it is no wonder that our African American children feel disconnected and walk around with their pants down, with no sense of their ancestors’ legacies, which are enormous and have lifted this nation to the status of a civilizational super-power.  Where is academia to redress these falsehoods?  Baldwin said it best a long time ago, something to the effect that “it took my grandfather and grandmother’s time, my father and my mother’s time, my nephews and my niece’s time; how long will it take for your progress?”

Why do we in America continue to fund and worship the classical music of Vienna and Italy, Paris and Bonn, when we do not even bother to teach our children in elementary, middle, and high school curriculum about the revolutionary music of our own American musicians: Armstrong, Ellington, James Reese Europe, Henderson, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Parker, Gillespie, etc., musicians who have single-handedly disrupted all European musical standards to the point where young European musicians from Clapton to John Mayall, the Beatles to the Who, Led Zeppelin to the Stones, etc…. are collectively mostly playing American or American-influenced popular musics born out of the Blues of the South of our nation?

So as a result and thanks to a ruthless economic system, in fifty years we went from Ellington, Armstrong, Reese Europe, Tatum, and King Oliver… people who raised America’s standards of aesthetics to new heights that gave America the status of a civilizational super-power that the world over-emulated, to being portrayed with our pants down to our ankles, underwear showing, with inappropriate language skills, incable of high aesthetics, portrayed as buffoons all over the planet through these despicable cable channels that delight in projecting these debilitating images of Black people, images born out of the despair engendered by the economic oppression and the legacy of slavery, Jim Crow and academic and political oppression.

It hurts me as an educator to see the negative impact that our economic, judicial and education systems have had on our communities; systems we do not control thus are subjected to.  I often tell my students, when you see artists who called themselves “DukeEllington, “Count” Basie, Nat “King” Cole… these titles they gave themselves were in direct relationship to their commitment to their art form.  Today, when I hear the titles you give yourselves – “Pimp this”, Gangsta that, etc… pants down the ankles, mysogynists, uneducated, verbally abusive to women… these titles are also representative of your relationship to your craft.  But these are not our collective standards of aesthetics at work, these are symptoms, and the reflection of the monumental economic, political, and academic hurt inflicted on our communities as a result of this unbridled capitalism that ravages our daily lives.

I am convinced that we can and will do better as a community as we begin the process of reconstructing an image and an ideal that suits our sensibilities and heals our family structures.

Stay tuned for Pt. 2 with Pascal (Bokar) Thiam, when he discusses his book From Timbuktu to the Mississippi Delta.

Posted in Book Review | 1 Comment

Swing & The Blues: still essential skills & wisdom for successful jazz musicians?

In what we anticipate will be a series of commentaries from young jazz musicians (in this case we’re talking 20 and 30something artists).  Our first respondent is the very thoughtful and grounded pianist Aaron Goldberg. Born & raised in Boston, Goldberg’s advanced music studies began at age 17 at the New School for Jazz and Contemporary Music.  After enrolling at Harvard, where he graduated in ’96, Aaron won the IAJE Clifford Brown/Stan Getz Fellowship award.

Speaking of swing & the blues, Goldberg certainly got a full dose of that grounding as part of Betty Carter‘s acclaimed incubator program Jazz Ahead.  Since then Goldberg has been sideman to Joshua Redman, Kurt Rosenwinkel, Madeleine Peyroux, Guillermo Klein, Terry Gibbs/Buddy DeFranco, and a host of others.  His current — and fourth — recording as a leader is “Home,” with Reuben Rogers on bass and Eric Harland on drums.

The basic premise of this anticipated series of inquiries was a recent interview in one of the jazz prints where an artist talked about how, to their ultimate detriment it seems a growing number of jazz musicians trained in the conservatories or university programs seem so focused on writing complex, original material that they wind up writing and playing with what seems to be the sole intent of impressing their peers, rather than playing for audiences.

In his recent DownBeat magazine profile Aaron Goldberg went in the opposite direction and spoke to the continuing need for developing and emerging artists to be somehow versed in swing and the blues (perhaps before launching off into their original writing?).  So I reached out and asked Aaron to expound on that thought for The Independent Ear.

Aaron Goldberg: I think there are three separate issues that your question raises, and they’re worth treating separately.

1) Whether conservatories and university programs are contributing to the fact that some of the original music produced by jazz musicians today is inaccessible to a wide general audience.  My own opinion is that music schools ought to be neither blamed nor credited for the artistic decisions of their graduates, whether poor or admirable.  The reason is that both the most and least brilliant of my peers all spent at least a significant period in some kind of conservatory or university jazz program.

What separates the brightest among us from the rest is that they realized early on that one does not and cannot learn to play jazz in a classroom.  Rather one learns to be a great jazz musician the same way that Charlie Parker and Louis Armstrong and John Coltrane and Miles Davis learned: by copying the greats that came before, especially those one finds most personally inspiring.  Any innovations that stand the test of time necessarily emerge out of this classic process of immersion imitation and assimilation, including spending as much time on the bandstand as possible discovering and developing one’s own voice.

The relative paucity of great bands today compared to yesterday is not the fault of music schools, but rather a complicated combination of cultural and economic shifts, marketing-related problems and record industry related problems, for which various culprits include: the rise and primacy of the music video – which decreases aural attention spans and privileges ‘eye candy’ and sensationalism over musical storytelling — the fact that fewer venues are able to support multi-night engagements, a flood of independent and self-produced CDs and concerts with little quality control, poor or no music education in public schools leading to a smaller potential audience, hyper-capitalized corporate marketing of sex and money in music in general, and various other social and economic factors in and around the jazz world.  But music schools themselves are probably not to blame, for no one really learns how to play in a school setting anyway.

2) The relation between Complexity and Quality. Great jazz musicians have been composing and playing complex original material for a long time.  Music is a form of human communication.  A great jazz musician takes his or her audience on a narrative journey that leaves the listener psychologically (or ‘spiritually’) altered, and hopefully grateful for the experience.  This transformation provides the social motive for improvisation as an art form.  Of course complexity (of tunes or solos) for its own sake has never been a recipe for quality, but neither has complexity precluded quality.

There is plenty of bad music, along with plenty of good music, of all degrees of complexity.  The music of Bird and Trane is obviously extremely complex yet beautiful.  No jazz lover (least of all me) could ever suggest that the universe would have been better off had such masters opted to simplify their work.  A living master like Abdullah Ibrahim writes relatively simple songs that are perfect and beautiful just as they are.  Other living masters like Kurt Rosenwinkel or Guillermo Klein write intricate songs that are also perfect and beautiful just as they are.  The same principle applies to improvised solos.  A Hank Mobley or Peter Bernstein solo may be relatively simpler in terms of the number of notes it contains than a Lenny Tristano or Mark Turner solo.  But all four musicians are/were great jazz musicians.

There is an ever-shifting balance between simplicity and complexity that all great artists have to negotiate in their own work, but by no means is this dialectic fixed in such a way that complexity somehow precludes beauty.

One problem I do see is that young musicians sometimes seem to forget that what makes jazz high art is first and foremost the quality of the improvisation. Great jazz musicians always have been by and large improvisers first and composers second, with very few arguable exceptions (e.g. Monk/Ellington/Shorter).  One error student musicians tend to make today is that even as beginning or middling improvisers, they often spend a lot of time already trying to write original material.  Many seem to think they ought to (or have to) record a CD of original music by age 18 or 21 and build a website and Facebook page to promote it.  This is an artistic mistake.  No one wants to attend a gig if the improvisations that follow the melodies are mediocre, no matter how ingenious the tunes (and of course it’s also hard to write great tunes).  This brings me to he third and related point.

Aaron and his trio mates, left: drummer Eric Harland, middle: bassist Reuben Rogers

3) How to become a good jazz improviser. It is extremely difficult (not necessarily impossible, just very difficult and therefore very rare) to become a great improvising jazz musician  without spending a large amount of time learning how to swing and phrase melodically over standard song forms and chord changes, including the blues.  This is mainly an empirical point.  Every fine jazz musician I know of, of ANY age, style and instrument, from Wayne Shorter to Miguel Zenon to Lee Konitz to Ornette Coleman to Jan Garbarek, from Brad Mehldau to Jason Moran to Jacky Terrason to Colin Vallon, has a deep respect for this aspect of the jazz tradition.  No matter what they choose to perform on a given night or stage in their career, all spent time learning to play song forms and blues, and other vehicles for melodic improvisation, and all display a deep love of the rhythmic aspects of swing as well.

Why is this? It is because these skills are vital to one’s fluency and efficacy as a jazz improviser, in any setting.  Even if one chooses to focus wholly on performing original music or free music or ethnic musics from around the world, studying the jazz language gives you the vocabulary and grammar to speak eloquently in a variety of genres.

This fact reflects a simpler and more general empirical fact about human achievement in any realm: one must study the masters in order to achieve mastery.  To be a great composer one must study other great composers.  No great composer has ever lived who did not do so.  This is why [in the DB article] I said something like “if you think you can be a great musician without learning to swing and play standards, just prove it to me.”  It’s probably not impossible to accomplish, given the many surprising capacities of the human brain.  It’s just very improbable.

Look around at other realms of art and human accomplishment and you won’t be surprised.  Great writers read other great writers.  Great actors study other great actors. Great painters study other great painters.  Great architects study other great architects. Great presidents study other great presidents.  Simply put, it seems to be a necessary process in any field.  Given that the greatest jazz musicians all excel at phrasing melodically over song forms and blues, among their many personal qualities, it seems intuitive that one would need to study their example in order to advance as a jazz musician.  This does NOT mean, however, that all great jazz musicians must perform or record classic material or make it central to their artistic identity.  But it does imply that a budding jazz student ought to study the finest examples of this material — and practice it with other musicians, given the social nature of the art — in order to progress towards greatness.

Aaron Goldberg: www.aarongoldberg.com


Posted in Artist's P.O.V. | 4 Comments